This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Fix ld for ELF/PPC

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:00:25 +0930
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix ld for ELF/PPC
References: <200209291441.KAA01834@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <20020929170140.A25376@lucon.org> <200209300356.XAA04557@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200209301430.KAA06025@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200209301711.NAA06365@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:11:54PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Alan,
>    Okay I repeated the build of binutils 2.13.90.0.5 with the 
> previous patch sans the ld/emulparams/elf32ppc.sh changes.
> The resulting binutils builds fine, passes make check and once
> install builds a prelinkable libhesiod.so.0. So the fix to    
> ld/emultempl/elf32.em looks to be sufficient to resolve the
> problem. Do you plan to regress the ld/emulparams/elf32ppc.sh
> changes back out of binutils cvs since they seem unnecessary?

Thanks.  No, we'll keep the elf32ppc.sh change.  It's the correct
fix for this particular powerpc problem.  Think of my change as
being a safety net.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- Re: -zcombreloc-less shared libs from ld
  - From: Jack Howarth
- PATCH: Fix ld for ELF/PPC
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Fix ld for ELF/PPC
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: PATCH: Fix ld for ELF/PPC
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]