This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at fuse dot net>
Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:28:21 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects
References: <20020813102810.A7345@lucon.org> <200208131959.01314@enzo.bigblue.local> <20020813110619.A7987@lucon.org> <1029262396.7403.4.camel@bogus>

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 02:13:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> HJ,
>    How important is it to rebuild glibc with this newest binutils?
> Will its symbol versioning/exporting be effected by this newest
> binutils patch? As I read things it seems not be to necessary.
> Only...
> 
> 1) rebuild glibc-2-2-branch with glibc-2-2-pcc patch using
> current binutils-cvs
> 2) rebuild binutils-cvs with this newest binutils patch
> 3) rebuild gcc-3.2 with the patched binutils
> 
> Am I reading things correctly? I ask because I want to be able
> to tell Debian what specific order these mods must be built in.

It looks ok.


H.J.

References:
- PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Don't count definitions in shared objects
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]