This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>,Dan Nicolaescu <dann at godzilla dot ICS dot UCI dot EDU>,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 00:45:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup
References: <200102151617.aa17403@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu><npbsa5yg7c.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><15634.29938.777456.889449@localhost.redhat.com><np3cvgv3pg.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> writes:

>> There are 2 versions of dwarf2.h, which could be unified. I've heard
>> 'rumours' that this was going to eventually happen, i.e. gcc would
>> drop its own version and just use the include/elf one. Jason? Would
>> this be feasible?

> I hope so!  That confused me for a bit when I ran into it.

Now that GCC distributions include the include/ directory, I think that
would be fine.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup
  - From: Elena Zannoni
- Re: [very old] Re: dwarf2 cleanup
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]