This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:46:38PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:24:09PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:33:58PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 13:35, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ports do. '.file 1 "foo.c"' is DWARF-2 usage, not STABS usage, and gas > > > > > > has no business trying to second-guess the compiler. > > > > > > > > > > But it is not an excuse to break the existing gcc binaries. Here is a > > > > > new patch. It basically treats > > > > > > > > Why? If one can update binutils, one can update gcc as well, can't one? > > > > It's a gcc bug, after all. > > > > > > I agree. I've talked to daniel off line and he's working on a patch that > > > should solve a lot of the problems. I'll let him post it when he's done. > > > > Here it is. It'll even work with old compilers for stabs, like H.J. > > wanted. We eventually arrived at just about the same patches. > > > > Eric, changes since last time: "-mdebug" and clearer setting of > > ECOFF_DEBUGGING, as Richard pointed out; handling the first stab > > separately, as H.J. asked. > > > > GCC will need to be updated for DWARF-2; I'll send a revised version of > > that in a bit. > > > > Could you please post a patch without diffs to configure? Thanks. Sorry about that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Attachment:
mips-gas-debugs3.patch.new
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |