This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: How to reach ELF specification maintainers?


Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:
> On 30 May 2002, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org> writes:
> > > I'd like to register new architectures for the e_machine field
> > > in ELF headers.  However, I haven't found any way to get in
> > > touch with ELF people.
> > I believe I found it now: registry@caldera.com.
> When you're certain (as in "confirmed contact") we should change
> all those places in the sources ;-) that mention
> registry@sco.com (well, without grepping, there's at least
> include/elf/common.h above where the other EM_* are #defined).

These grep hits seem relevant:

./bfd/doc/bfdint.texi:these magic numbers are assigned by SCO; if you want to get a magic
./bfd/doc/bfdint.texi:@email{registry@@sco.com}.  In the BFD sources, the magic numbers are
./include/elf/common.h:   are officially assigned by registry@sco.com.  See below for a list of
./include/elf/common.h:   unofficial e_machine number should eventually ask registry@sco.com for

I can take care of updating this.  I'll send a patch when I hear from
the Caldera folks.

-- 
Lars Brinkhoff          http://lars.nocrew.org/     Linux, GCC, PDP-10,
Brinkhoff Consulting    http://www.brinkhoff.se/    HTTP programming


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]