This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add armeb-*-netbsdelf* target
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at wasabisystems dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:22:30 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add armeb-*-netbsdelf* target
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> The following adds an armeb-*-netbsdelf* target to binutils.
>
> I have changes to config.guess and config.sub, also... I suppose
> those need to be submitted to config-patches first, so I haven't
> included them here.
>
> OK to commit?
>
> bfd:
> * config.bfd (armeb-*-netbsdelf*): New target.
>
> ld:
> * Makefile.am (ALL_EMULATIONS): Add earmelfb_nbsd.o.
> (earmelfb_nbsd.c): New rule.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> * configure.tgt (armeb-*-netbsdelf*): New target.
> (arm-*-netbsdelf*): Add armelfb_nbsd to targ_extra_emuls.
> (arm-*-netbsd*): Likewise.
> * emulparams/armelfb_nbsd.sh: New file.
>
Ok by me. But why sometimes just a 'b' extension and sometimes 'eb'? Is
this consistent with other targets?
R.