This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: i386-pc-nto-qnx patch
- From: "Graeme Peterson" <gp at qnx dot com>
- To: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au (Alan Modra)
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:55:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: i386-pc-nto-qnx patch
Hi, Alan. Thanks for the reply. I will find out from the author of
that portion and get back to you ASAP.
Cheers.
GP
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:20:05AM -0400, Graeme Peterson wrote:
> > I've seen a lot of talk about merging patches, and was wondering
> > if anyone has had time to look at the i386-pc-nto-qnx patch I
> > submitted.
>
> I've looked at it a couple of times, thought "why is he doing that?"
> and put it aside until I could analyse your code a little deeper.
>
> So, why is IS_CONTAINED_BY_FILEPOS necessary? Just because
> _bfd_elf_make_section_from_shdr isn't setting up lma correctly for
> you? Seems to me the right solution is some tweakery to
> _bfd_elf_make_section_from_shdr. You'll probably want this anyway
> as other parts of bfd look at the section lma.
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
>