This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] resubmit: change defines to enums

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, nickc at redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:06:53 +0930
Subject: Re: [RFA] resubmit: change defines to enums
References: <200204112155.g3BLtur10644@reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com> <20020412033723.GK1042@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3CC05CE8.2798C373@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:07:36AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Alan Modra wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:55:56PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > >
> > >       * archures.c: Change bfd_mach_ constants to enums.
> > >       * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
> > 
> > Have you checked that this compiles with a K&R compiler?  If so, then
> > it's OK.
> 
> I haven't -- but why wouldn't it?  There are lots of enums already in
> bfd.

I had an idea that enums had different scope rules under old compilers.
Maybe it's structure fields, and maybe I'm dreaming.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- [RFA] resubmit: change defines to enums
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA] resubmit: change defines to enums
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [RFA] resubmit: change defines to enums
  - From: Michael Snyder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]