This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mips n32 vs gdb

From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:14:59 +0200
Subject: Re: mips n32 vs gdb
References: <20020415175546.A27887@redhat.com> <20020416064225.GC18541@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20020415234527.A20865@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:42:25AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Please don't do so. Otherwise I will have to introduce it again
> > when I add the framework for n32 support.
> 
> Of course you will have to do it again.  You cannot
> leave n32 broken while you work on this.

I'm somewhat surprised that n32 seems to work for you. :-)
I don't know the requirements of gdb, but gas still can't create
conforming n32, and ld can't handle it fully.

Thiemo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mips n32 vs gdb
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- mips n32 vs gdb
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: mips n32 vs gdb
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: mips n32 vs gdb
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]