This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Modify the mips gas behavior for -g -O
- From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: linux-mips at oss dot sgi dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 06 Feb 2002 13:16:47 -0800
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Modify the mips gas behavior for -g -O
- References: <yov5ofj65elj.fsf@broadcom.com><15454.22661.855423.532827@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk><20020204083115.C13384@lucon.org><15454.47823.837119.847975@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk><20020204172857.A22337@lucon.org> <20020204215804.A2095@nevyn.them.org><20020205113017.A6144@lucon.org> <20020205135407.A8309@lucon.org><20020206113259.A15431@dea.linux-mips.net><20020206124538.A28632@lucon.org> <20020206130037.A29208@lucon.org>
> Here is a patch which does what I want. Any comments?
>
Does anyone care if we have MIPS compatibility? I remember seeing this a
few years ago and wondering why we were doing it this way. I remember at
one time debuggers had problems with optimized code, but gdb has come a
long way since then. Is there any reason to have this code in there at
all now, i.e. should we just go off of optimization level and not debug
level at all?
> Eric, can you approve
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00028.html
>
If this is the one for header file information, then go ahead. We need
to come up with a better way of doing this though.
-eric
--
I will not use abbrev.