This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA:] ld section location mishap. Attention PE, HPPA, PPC64.


On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:24:23AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 22:44:46 -0500
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 03:01:43AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > The same problem seems to exist for other callers: pe-dll.c
> > > (twice), emultempl/hppaelf.em and emultempl/ppc64elf.em.  I
> > > leave those to the respective maintainer.  (Sorry.)
> > 
> > Was this introduced recently?
> 
> It seems it was introduced by:
> 
> 2001-11-14  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> 	* emultempl/elf32.em (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_finish): New.
> 	(struct ld_emulation_xfer_struct): Use it.
> :-)
> 
> If you mean reset_memory_regions, it and its call in
> lang_process was introduced 1995 it seems.

That's what I meant :)

> >  And HPPA almost certainly has the same
> > problem,
> 
> Other than emultempl/hppaelf.em as I indicated?

No, I was just agreeing with you.  What's the issue in pe-dll.c (and
can you fix that one as simply also)?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]