This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: SHT_GROUP Support in binutils
- From: "Jessica Han" <jessica at cup dot hp dot com>
- To: "'Jakub Jelinek'" <jakub at redhat dot com>,<binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>, <reva at cup dot hp dot com>, <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:18:30 -0800
- Subject: RE: SHT_GROUP Support in binutils
- Reply-to: <jessica at cup dot hp dot com>
Thanks for the response.
eh_frame is new to me, I am trying to find the section group information for
Vague Linkage (COMDAT Sections) in IA64-ABI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 AM
To: Jessica Han; binutils@sources.redhat.com; reva@cup.hp.com;
sje@cup.hp.com
Subject: Re: SHT_GROUP Support in binutils
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:32:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Why is it needed
>
> It isn't needed for eh_frame now, which is another reason why I haven't
> continued with the gcc patch. There may be other good uses for
> section groups though.
Of course, I just mentioned it because .-foo is no longer problem...
Jakub