This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: HELP ME - porting to VLIW machine
Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:
> > 11, -11 bits in an address
> That looks really strange. Do you really only have 11 bit long
> addresses ?
If, say, there was a machine with an (instruction and data) word size
of 36 bits, but with only the 30 least significant bits valid for
addresses, would the appropriate value in bfd_arch_info_type be 30 or
36?
Assume further that there was an older version of the architecture
with only 18-bit addresses. Should that be a different
bfd_arch_info_type, with a distinct machine number?
--
Lars Brinkhoff http://lars.nocrew.org/ Linux, GCC, PDP-10
Brinkhoff Consulting http://www.brinkhoff.se/ programming