This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

automake on binutils


There is a problem with the automake being used on binutils.  The same 
version is being used for gdb, afaik.  In order to build binutils (and 
other stage 1 modules) on the vendor compiler on HPUX 10.20, we need this 
patch in automake/m4/ccstdc.m4.

I understand the automake binutils uses is old.  Should we just add this 
patch or update automake to a later version?

1999-02-07  Paul Eggert  <eggert@twinsun.com>
 
        * m4/ccstdc.m4 (AM_PROG_CC_STDC): Prefer -Ae to -Aa
        -D_HPUX_SOURCE, since -Ae allows `long long' and this is
        needed by some programs.

Index: ccstdc.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/automake/m4/ccstdc.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 ccstdc.m4
--- ccstdc.m4   1999/01/21 19:24:23     1.3
+++ ccstdc.m4   2001/10/26 16:03:12
@@ -38,9 +38,10 @@ ac_save_CC="$CC"
 # breaks some systems' header files.
 # AIX                  -qlanglvl=ansi
 # Ultrix and OSF/1     -std1
-# HP-UX                        -Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE
+# HP-UX 10.20 and later                -Ae
+# HP-UX older versions         -Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE
 # SVR4                 -Xc -D__EXTENSIONS__
-for ac_arg in "" -qlanglvl=ansi -std1 "-Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE" "-Xc -D__EXTENSIONS__"
+for ac_arg in "" -qlanglvl=ansi -std1 -Ae "-Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE" "-Xc -D__EXTENSIONS__"
 do
   CC="$ac_save_CC $ac_arg"
   AC_TRY_COMPILE(


--
Jeff Holcomb
jeffh@redhat.com
GDB Engineering
Red Hat, Inc.





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]