This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Building binutils for uclinux/arm
In message <3BDD1BFD.9E7945DC@acter.ch>, Adrian von Bidder writes:
>Philip Blundell wrote:
>> "arm-uclinux" is correct. It seems that the support for uclinux in
>> config.sub has got lost somehow. This happens with the main trunk as well
>> as 2.11.
>
>... which means I'm back to binutils-2.9.5 (or doing binary search for
>the version where it disappeared, of course.)
Well, assuming that's the only problem, it's easy enough to fix. Try this.
Index: config.sub
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/config.sub,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 config.sub
--- config.sub 2001/09/28 21:04:51 1.26
+++ config.sub 2001/10/29 09:19:58
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@
| -interix* | -uwin* | -rhapsody* | -darwin* | -opened* \
| -openstep* | -oskit* | -conix* | -pw32* | -nonstopux* \
| -storm-chaos* | -tops10* | -tenex* | -tops20* | -its* \
- | -os2* | -vos*)
+ | -os2* | -vos* | -uclinux*)
# Remember, each alternative MUST END IN *, to match a version number.
;;
-qnx*)
>Shouldn't matter, as long it cooperates with gcc-3.0.2 (I just thought
>when upgrading to the new gcc I should upgrade binutils as well)
You probably should, yes.
p.