This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Does -march=r5000 imply HAVE_64BIT_GPRS?

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: Does -march=r5000 imply HAVE_64BIT_GPRS?
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 00:40:50 -0400
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010817104205.A14413@lucon.org> <20010817201027.I381@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20010817141020.B17530@lucon.org>

> 1. When -mips2 is passed to as, should anything beyond MIPS II be
> generated? My answer is no.
> 2. Assuming we do allow extra insns beyond MIPS II, what value should
> be in EF_MIPS_ARCH? bfd_set_arch_mach is used to set EF_MIPS_ARCH.

Just a heads up.  You want to be very careful when thinking about 
changing those EF flags.  GDB looks at them and interprets the result.

Rather than trying to ``fix'' the flags, you may be better off 
abandoning the current mechanism.

	Andrew

References:
- Re: Does -march=r5000 imply HAVE_64BIT_GPRS?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Does -march=r5000 imply HAVE_64BIT_GPRS?
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: Does -march=r5000 imply HAVE_64BIT_GPRS?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]