This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static

To: John Reiser <jreiser at BitWagon dot com>
Subject: Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:21:02 -0700
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <991410192.21718.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <3B17DE86.DBAB8D23@BitWagon.com> <20010601120832.A7786@lucon.org> <3B17F612.7DACA4C2@BitWagon.com>

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 01:07:46PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > Please also CC your binutils bug reports to binutils@sources.redhat.com.
> > There are no archives for bug-binutils.
> 
> OK.  I note that Philip Blundell has provided a reference in this case.

I don't see anything wrong. You have to used -shared to create DSO.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: John Reiser
- Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: John Reiser

References:
- bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: John Reiser
- Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: John Reiser

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]