This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Stdcall support in binutils

To: dmitry at baikal dot ru
Subject: Re: Stdcall support in binutils
From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:10:06 -0400
CC: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <04cb01c0dc84$912e0540$c5823bd5@dima> <200105141510.LAA02047@envy.delorie.com> <09a901c0dc8c$73b3f6c0$c5823bd5@dima> <200105141555.LAA04163@envy.delorie.com> <00a801c0dd04$5703fa20$c6823bd5@dima> <200105151425.KAA18907@envy.delorie.com> <019b01c0dd4d$321c2720$cf823bd5@dima> <200105151756.NAA21036@envy.delorie.com> <003d01c0df95$96e009c0$d7823bd5@dima>


> The attached tiny patch fixes dlltool to respect --kill-at (aka -k)
> while generating .exp file. It solves all my current troubles.
> Is it correct?

It looks correct to me, but we'd need a suitable ChangeLog entry (not
a diff, just an entry) before we can apply it.  Also, the
documentation for -k in binutils.texi is wrong.  Could you fix that
too?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: Dmitry Timoshkov

References:
- Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Stdcall support in binutils
  - From: Dmitry Timoshkov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]