This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: binutils in CVS is broken

To: amodra at one dot net dot au
Subject: Re: binutils in CVS is broken
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 17:01:06 -0700
Cc: jakub at redhat dot com, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010413214130.A31374@lucon.org> <20010413214700.A31484@lucon.org> <20010413220343.A31748@lucon.org> <20010414192046.B16364@squeak.one.net.au>

On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 07:20:46PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:03:43PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > 
> > I think binutils in CVS is at least broken on Linux/ia32/glibc 2.2.
> > Has anyone run "make check" on today's binutils from CVS on ia32?
> 
> Not yet, but I did yesterday.  There are some failures in the ld
> testsuite due to the new name-mangling in gcc-3.0, and a failure in
> binutils due to glibc nagging about mktemp.  I suppose we'll need
> to fix them soon.

Jakub's patch to bfd/section.c has fixed all my problems.


H.J.

References:
- Does the merge patch really work?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Is binutils in CVS broken? (Re: Does the merge patch really work?)
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: binutils in CVS is broken
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: binutils in CVS is broken
  - From: amodra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]