This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: elflink.h -Bsymbolic change
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Subject: Re: elflink.h -Bsymbolic change
- From: Alan Modra <alan at linuxcare dot com dot au>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:12:39 +1000 (EST)
- cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:39:23PM +1000, Alan Modra wrote:
> > H.J., before my 2001-04-04 change went in, protected symbols would have
> > lost their .plt entry. Are you saying this is wrong?
>
> I tend to think it is wrong if it is true. As I said, protected symbols
> should be no different from default, global symbols to the static
> linker since protected symbols are the same as default, global symbols
> if there are second definitions.
OK, I'll defer to your judgement. If the dynamic linker does the right
thing then there should be no problem in keeping a .plt entry. Please
check in your patch, hp.
--
Alan Modra