This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A patch for elf32.em (Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined)

To: fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, hjl at valinux dot com
Subject: Re: A patch for elf32.em (Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined)
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:41:31 -0800
References: <20010205211708R.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <jebssgkl77.fsf@hawking.suse.de> <20010207024456.A10994@venus.cs.mu.oz.au> <jeu2673iwq.fsf@hawking.suse.de> <20010206112928.A29981@valinux.com> <20010207120535.A25034@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <20010206171540.E5565@valinux.com> <sihf27gpt3.fsf@daffy.airs.com>

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:00:40PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> If it is, then I think the linker should be fixed to not warn
> about undefined references from shared libraries, even when
> --no-undefined is used.

I agree.  I think --no-undefined should apply only to references
originating in the shared library being created.

r~

References:
- Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- A patch for elf32.em (Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined)
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A patch for elf32.em (Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined)
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]