This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections

To: aph at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:24:48 -0500
CC: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <200012071829.KAA13710@elmo.cygnus.com><m3lmtsystx.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><200012071849.NAA05703@envy.delorie.com><m3g0k0yr5j.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><200012071926.OAA06055@envy.delorie.com> <14895.61313.986995.171052@host130.cygnus>


Hmmm... replicating that big switch statement bothers me, but merging
the two would be just as messy support-wise.

This method means that different FDE's may have different sets of
columns.  Is this intentional?  It's probably easier than scanning the
whole eh_frame section twice, though.

I guess I like it :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [patch] readelf.c - dump .eh_frame sections
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]