This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:53:32AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I don't understand why David kept asking for Linux to change.
>
> Because I'd like to follow something written down in a specification or
> standard.
Please do. Both Ulrich and I have told you that your interpretation of
gABI is incorrect.
>
> What should be the standard for using this PT_NOTE section method? Linux
> names the section ".note.ABI-tag", NetBSD ".note.ident". I made FreeBSD
> follow Linux with ".note.ABI-tag". Or does one search thru all the
> PT_NOTE type sections looking for a type of 0x01? Search all the PT_NOTE
> sections looking for a name string you recognize?
>
We can make a proposal to gABI.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)