This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: hpux: PA-RISC?? which version?
- To: Markus Werle <markus at lufmech dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Subject: Re: hpux: PA-RISC?? which version?
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:04 -0600
- cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <39E31E5D.45DE0830@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>you write:
> Hi!
>
> Can someone explain, why binutils configured for
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 are PA-RISC1.1 executables?
Because we never under any circumstances want the tools to default to
creating PA64 binaries.
> I had the impression hp cc normally creates PA-RISC2.0
> executables per default.
HP's compilers create executables specific to the particular PA chip in
your system. Ie, if you've got a PA1.0 box, you get PA1.0 binaries, if
you have a PA1.1 box, you get PA1.1 binaries, if you have a PA2.0 box,
you get PA2.0 binaries. If you ask nicely, you can get PA64 binaries.
If you want PA2.0 binaries from GCC use -mpa-risc-2-0
jeff