This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- To: hjl at lucon dot org
- Subject: Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:46:30 -0700
- CC: jason at redhat dot com, wilson at cygnus dot com, aoliva at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <20000520093135A.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <orhfbt9nwh.fsf@tamanduatei.dcc.unicamp.br> <20000520095133R.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <20000520220957.A25977@valinux.com> <200005222255.PAA26407@wilson.cygnus.com> <u9puo728zl.fsf_-_@casey.soma.redhat.com> <20000721074920.A9966@lucon.org>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:49:20 -0700
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> Exactly. BTW, you won't see it if you use newlib. It is too bad not
> many people use glibc for cross compiling instead of newlibc. At least,
> they don't maintain gcc :-(. It is a fun to build a complete cross
> compiler from Linux/ia32 to Linux/ia64 :-). You will see a few build
> problems.
Actually, at Red Hat we cross-compile to various versions of linux all
the time, and our release engineering people don't see any particular
problems that would be fixed by this patch.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>