This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Bug in ar? Rather in assembler!
- To: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker at physik dot rwth-aachen dot de>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Bug in ar? Rather in assembler!
- From: Cyrille Artho <cartho at mordor dot ch>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:40:03 +0200
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007191246500.4649-100000@acp3bf>
Hi all,
I now tested everything on different hardware (same problem), and ran
g++ with -save-temps. In two builds where no BFD error messages occurred
but two .o files were faulty in one case,
*the .ii and .s files generated by -save-temps were the same*
but the .o files were not.
This hints at a defect in the assembler. I am currently trying to
produce a third build, where error messages in the BFD part of the
binutils also occur.
I am not sure whether I can provide any .ii or .s (or even .c or .cxx)
files to people who could use them for debugging. I will try to convince
people in this company to let me :)
--
Regards,
Cyrille Artho - http://artho.com
Alcohol is the anesthesia by which we endure the operation of life.
-- George Bernard Shaw