This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: What is status of TI C3x/C4x support in binutils 2.10?
- To: Philip Blundell <Philip dot Blundell at pobox dot com>
- Subject: Re: What is status of TI C3x/C4x support in binutils 2.10?
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:46:49 -0500
- CC: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <39426A14.1CC10BB1@OARcorp.com> <E1316VZ-0004UX-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
- Reply-To: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> >It was in the snapshots but the target has disappeared
> >in bfd/config.bfd.
>
> It seems OK in the CVS branch:
>
> c30-*-*aout* | tic30-*-*aout*)
> targ_defvec=tic30_aout_vec
> ;;
> c30-*-*coff* | tic30-*-*coff*)
> targ_defvec=tic30_coff_vec
>
> If this is missing from the release archive it must mean I have screwed
> something up.
My bad. The target was c4x-*coff* in the patches I last did
much work with. I hope this is consistent with gcc and gdb
since they were also using c4x-*coff*.
> p.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985