This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: include/elf/hppa.h in gdb 4.18





On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

> 
>   In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906211444540.30178-100000@oar3remote>you write:
>   > > Don't even try to use the PA ELF tools right now.  They're under major
>   > > reorganization.
>   > 
>   > OK.  I was just trying to update the gdb RTEMS patch to 4.18.
> If you're just trying to get up to gdb-4.18 you can probably make a little
> tweak or two.  For some reason I thought you were trying to get the
> mainline code building.  You can probably delete the offending code in your
> gdb-4.18 rtems patch.

OK.  I have not checked it yet but my hunch is that hppa1.1-elf would not
build in gdb 4.18.  So far I have not found another example that looked
like that same enumerated type.  I will try to build hppa1.1-elf just to
make sure though and report on that.

>   > > I'd forgotten RTEMS depended on this stuff.  Ugh.
>   > 
>   > The RTEMS target is not much more than an alias.  If I need to change to
>   > basing it on another target, it is not a big deal. Just let me know what
>   > the best embedded hppa1.1 target is once this settles out again.
> I doubt you'll need to change it.  We're just going to have to create a lot of
> construction debris in the PA ELF code for a while.
> 
> I'll be primarily concentrating on 64bit ELF, but it's going to have serious
> impact on the 32bit ELF tools.  The Linux folks are going to be beating on the
> 32bit ELF tools (hopefully in parallel).

The hppa is not the most popular RTEMS target. :)  So I am not going to
lose much sleep over it right now.

--joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]