This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Duplicate symbols in recent cvs source
- To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
- Subject: Re: Duplicate symbols in recent cvs source
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
- Date: 4 Jun 1999 15:00:12 -0400
- CC: nickc@cygnus.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
- References: <199906041852.OAA26748@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 14:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
gcc -O3 -s -o as-new app.o as.o atof-generic.o bignum-copy.o cond.o depend.o dwa
rf2dbg.o ecoff.o ehopt.o expr.o flonum-copy.o flonum-konst.o flonum-mult.o frags
.o hash.o input-file.o input-scrub.o listing.o literal.o macro.o messages.o outp
ut-file.o read.o sb.o stabs.o subsegs.o symbols.o write.o tc-hppa.o obj-som.o at
of-ieee.o ../opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libib
erty.a ./../intl/libintl.a
/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
_bfd_dwarf1_find_nearest_line (code)
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [as-new] Error 1
This routine appears to be in bfd/dwarf1.c. It appears to be missing
from the bfd/Makefile.
You're right, dwarf1.c was not correctly added to the BFD Makefile. I
just checked in a patch.
Ian