This is the mail archive of the binutils-cvs@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[binutils-gdb] PR22758, FAIL: Run pr22393-2


https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=76cb3a89a6615cf3418fa1efe8268bf6673a5c8a

commit 76cb3a89a6615cf3418fa1efe8268bf6673a5c8a
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 30 16:02:32 2018 +1030

    PR22758, FAIL: Run pr22393-2
    
    We can't map different disk pages into the same memory page; The last
    page mapped will simply overwrite any previous pages.  The
    executable/non-executable new_segment test ignored this fact, leading
    to a ld.so segfault on hppa when .dynamic is overwritten with zeros.
    
    This patch moves existing tests for demand paging with lma on the same
    memory page, to a new test performed before any case where we want a
    new segment due to protection or loadable conflicts.
    
    	PR 22758
    	* elf.c (_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments): Don't start a new
    	segment when demand paged with lma on the same page.  Test this
    	before load/non-load, executable/non-executable,
    	writable/non-writable tests and simplify.  Delete bogus relro
    	condition in writable/non-writable test.  Delete outdated
    	comment.  Formatting.

Diff:
---
 bfd/ChangeLog | 10 ++++++++++
 bfd/elf.c     | 40 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog
index 4a45b55..fb93985 100644
--- a/bfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/bfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
 2018-01-30  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
 
+	PR 22758
+	* elf.c (_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments): Don't start a new
+	segment when demand paged with lma on the same page.  Test this
+	before load/non-load, executable/non-executable,
+	writable/non-writable tests and simplify.  Delete bogus relro
+	condition in writable/non-writable test.  Delete outdated
+	comment.  Formatting.
+
+2018-01-30  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
+
 	* elflink.c (bfd_elf_define_start_stop): Make __start and __stop
 	symbols dynamic.
 
diff --git a/bfd/elf.c b/bfd/elf.c
index 90aef09..d71efd1 100644
--- a/bfd/elf.c
+++ b/bfd/elf.c
@@ -4727,33 +4727,35 @@ _bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
 		 the previous section, then we need a new segment.  */
 	      new_segment = TRUE;
 	    }
+	  else if ((abfd->flags & D_PAGED) != 0
+		   && (((last_hdr->lma + last_size - 1) & -maxpagesize)
+		       == (hdr->lma & -maxpagesize)))
+	    {
+	      /* If we are demand paged then we can't map two disk
+		 pages onto the same memory page.  */
+	      new_segment = FALSE;
+	    }
 	  /* In the next test we have to be careful when last_hdr->lma is close
 	     to the end of the address space.  If the aligned address wraps
 	     around to the start of the address space, then there are no more
 	     pages left in memory and it is OK to assume that the current
 	     section can be included in the current segment.  */
-	  else if ((BFD_ALIGN (last_hdr->lma + last_size, maxpagesize) + maxpagesize
-		    > last_hdr->lma)
-		   && (BFD_ALIGN (last_hdr->lma + last_size, maxpagesize) + maxpagesize
-		       <= hdr->lma))
+	  else if ((BFD_ALIGN (last_hdr->lma + last_size, maxpagesize)
+		    + maxpagesize > last_hdr->lma)
+		   && (BFD_ALIGN (last_hdr->lma + last_size, maxpagesize)
+		       + maxpagesize <= hdr->lma))
 	    {
 	      /* If putting this section in this segment would force us to
 		 skip a page in the segment, then we need a new segment.  */
 	      new_segment = TRUE;
 	    }
 	  else if ((last_hdr->flags & (SEC_LOAD | SEC_THREAD_LOCAL)) == 0
-		   && (hdr->flags & (SEC_LOAD | SEC_THREAD_LOCAL)) != 0
-		   && ((abfd->flags & D_PAGED) == 0
-		       || (((last_hdr->lma + last_size - 1) & -maxpagesize)
-			   != (hdr->lma & -maxpagesize))))
+		   && (hdr->flags & (SEC_LOAD | SEC_THREAD_LOCAL)) != 0)
 	    {
 	      /* We don't want to put a loaded section after a
 		 nonloaded (ie. bss style) section in the same segment
 		 as that will force the non-loaded section to be loaded.
-		 Consider .tbss sections as loaded for this purpose.
-		 However, like the writable/non-writable case below,
-		 if they are on the same page then they must be put
-		 in the same segment.  */
+		 Consider .tbss sections as loaded for this purpose.  */
 	      new_segment = TRUE;
 	    }
 	  else if ((abfd->flags & D_PAGED) == 0)
@@ -4770,20 +4772,10 @@ _bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
 	      new_segment = TRUE;
 	    }
 	  else if (! writable
-		   && (hdr->flags & SEC_READONLY) == 0
-		   && ((info != NULL
-			&& info->relro_end > info->relro_start)
-		       || (((last_hdr->lma + last_size - 1) & -maxpagesize)
-			   != (hdr->lma & -maxpagesize))))
+		   && (hdr->flags & SEC_READONLY) == 0)
 	    {
 	      /* We don't want to put a writable section in a read only
-		 segment, unless they are on the same page in memory
-		 anyhow and there is no RELRO segment.  We already
-		 know that the last section does not bring us past the
-		 current section on the page, so the only case in which
-		 the new section is not on the same page as the previous
-		 section is when the previous section ends precisely on
-		 a page boundary.  */
+		 segment.  */
 	      new_segment = TRUE;
 	    }
 	  else


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]