This is the mail archive of the autoconf@gnu.org mailing list for the autoconf project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe

To: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
Subject: Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>
Date: 08 Mar 2000 06:47:37 -0300
Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, autoconf-patches at gnu dot org, Autoconf List <autoconf at gnu dot org>
References: <Franz Sirl's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:26:26 +0100"> <4.3.2.20000303115425.00cd4a90@mail.lauterbach.com> <mv4aekgf5vy.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr> <00030521311900.09383@enzo.bigblue.local> <mv4u2ihrfwo.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr> <orya7tkdz3.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <mv4ityxre3h.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>

On Mar  8, 2000, Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr> wrote:

> I suggest to simply remove the second inclusion of unistd.h.

Agreed.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva     http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/     Enjoy Guaraná
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
  - From: Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
  - From: Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe
  - From: Akim Demaille

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]