Re: GDB gnats: c++ bugs

[Rick Moseley <rmoseley at redhat dot com>]

Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:08:19 +0200, Rick Moseley wrote:
>   
> > Rick Moseley wrote:
> >     
> > > Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > >       
> > > >   When you are at it there are also:
> > > > KFAIL: gdb.cp/templates.exp: constructor breakpoint (PRMS: gdb/1062)
> > > > KFAIL: gdb.cp/templates.exp: destructor breakpoint (PRMS: gdb/1112)
> > > >         
> ...
>   
> > > 1593 - problem with nested namespaces
> > >       
> >                 This appears to be fixed in current versions of  
> > gcc(4.1.2-33) and gdb(6.6-45).
> >     
>
> (1) IMO for Archer only upstream HEAD is relevant as it was decided it will
>     not be based on the RH/F patchset.  If your answer means it is not fixed
>     in HEAD but it is fixed in RH/F is it a request for a port and/or rework
>     it?  (I do not remember such fix in the RH/F patchset.)
>
>     For example I referred PR gdb/1062 and PR gdb/1112 above which are already
>     fixed in RH/F but it is a hack (ported Jeff Johnston's patchset) so
>     I expect Archer should get a possibly upstreamable variant of the fix
>     instead.
>
> (2) gdb-6.6-45 is neither from RHEL nor from any recent Fedora.
>   
Yeah, I am aware that this is fixed in HEAD, I am just for now trying to 
find what bugs that are listed in the gnats gdb bugzilla data base that 
are fixed in HEAD.  If they are and are not fixed in RH/F patchsets we 
want to identify those and need to figure out why they are not there.  
Thanks for the info about this particular one not being in the RH/F 
version of gdb, that's one less I have to investigate.  :)    If you 
have any info concerning what the status of the other listed bugs versus 
RH/F it would be most appreciated.

Thanks for responding Jan.
> Regards,
> Jan
>